Skip to main content

Analysis of International Maritime Disputes of India: Law and Role of Courts

 Analysis of International Maritime Disputes of India: Law and Role of Courts

Despite of clearly defined boundaries, maritime disputes are common where countries contend for inhabited and uninhabited islands. Sea as a popular means of trade and transport has played a crucial role in the growth of the maritime industry which led to the economic growth of a nation. Maritime security has always been a vital concern for the nations with coastal boundaries. The adoption of United Nation Convention on the Laws of Sea, 1982 (UNCLOS) acknowledged international crimes on high seas such as piracy.


Being a growing maritime power and with the coastline of around 7500 km, maritime security measures were essential for India. The recent soar in the number of piracy affairs and other international crimes near the Indian Ocean has revealed India to maritime warfare. However, in spite of India being a signatory to UNCLOS, minimal laws are available which explicitly deals with crimes and offences that happen at the high seas. Although the Indian legal framework provides various enactments and laws regulating the maritime activities such as division of maritime territories, ship arrests, merchant shipping, carriage of goods by sea etc., the Parliament of India has not been able to codify the law dealing with anti-piracy.


HISTORY


Although there was no codified law as the one that exists today, the rules and regulations concerning sea and maritime activities have been exiting since the 3rd millennium BCE. Before independence, the law relating to maritime laws in India were controlled by the British Government. The Coasting Vessels Act, 1838, Inland Stream Vessels Act, 1917, Admiralty Offences (Colonial) Act, 1849, Indian Registration of Ships Act, 1841, Indian Ports Act, 1908, Control of Shipping Act, 1947, are some of the regulations that dealt with maritime affairs in India.

Before India gained Independence, under The Colonial Court of Admiralty Act, 1890, the High Court of Bombay, Madras and Calcutta were the only judicial authorities competent to manage incidents related to Admiralty. The other courts of justice were prohibited from dealing with issues concerning the Admiralty. Under the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, the three presidency courts were conferred the same powers as that of the High Court of England. The law affiliated to Admiralty jurisdiction is relevant even today under Article 372 of the Constitution of India. Now, the law associated to Maritime claim is provided under Section 4 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017. Section 4 says that the High Court may exercise jurisdiction to hear and determine any question on a maritime claim, against any vessel, arising out of any dispute, mortgage, loss of life, loss or damage of goods, etc. The law relating to the arrest of a vessel in rem is provided under Section 5 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017.


What is Maritime law?


Maritime law can be defined as the body of law governing marine commerce and navigation, ship arrests, the carriage at of persons and property, and marine affairs in general; the rules governing contract, tort and workers' compensation claims or regarding commerce on or over water.

INDIA AND MARITIME LAWS


The triple-layered security system is created mainly to guard the Indian Coastline from maritime terrorism, piracy and to keep out foreign intruders. Firstly, the Indian Navy who is authorised for overall seaward security of long coastline. Secondly, the coast guards who protect the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to prevent poaching, smuggling and other illegal activities in the EEZ. Lastly, the customs officials, who scrutinise and monitor every commodity which enters the Indian boundaries.


For years India’s territorial waters and continental share were regulated by proclamations issued by the President of India. In 1976, after the 3rd United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”), was held at Geneva, the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zones and Maritime Zones Act, 1976 was enacted in India. The Act regulated land, minerals, and other resources, underlying the ocean, within the territorial waters, the continental shelf or the Exclusive Economic Zone(“EEZ”) endowed to the Union of India. The Act categorically specifies the limits of the territorial waters, continental shelf, EEZ and other maritime zones of India. It also issues the legal framework prescribing the nature, scope and extent of India’s rights, jurisdiction and control of various maritime zones; the maritime boundaries between India and its neighbouring countries; and the exploitation, exploration, conservation and management of natural resources within the maritime zones. Further, the Act offered to undertake separate legislation in future, as and when required, to manage the regulations for exploration and exploitation of particular resources under Indian jurisdiction.

Consequent to the adoption of the Act, the Maritime Zones of India (Regulation of Fishing by Foreign Vessels) Act, 1981 (MZI Act) was enacted to halt poaching activities by foreign fishing vessels in the Indian EEZ. Under the MZI Act, the EEZ was safeguarded from exploitation of living resources by Indians and/or foreign nationals aboard a foreign vessel, which did not hold a valid license/permit issued under the MZI Act. Thus, in many ways the MZI Act adds to the Act.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996)

     POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996) INTRODUCTION The medical profession is perhaps the noblest profession among any remaining professions in India. For a patient, the specialist resembles God. What's more, God is trustworthy. In any case, that is the patient's opinion. As a general rule, doctors are individuals. Furthermore, to fail is human. Doctors might submit a slip-up. Doctors might be careless. The care staff might be imprudent. Two demonstrations of carelessness might bring about a lot more pressing issue. It very well might be because of gross carelessness. The sky is the limit. In such a situation, it is basic to figure out who was careless, and under what conditions. For this situation, the Supreme Court separated carelessness, impulsiveness, and foolishness. An individual is supposed to be a careless individual when he/she unintentionally submits a demonstration of exclusion and disregards a positive obligation that he/she ought to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...
1 comment
Read more

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more