Skip to main content

Cyber Crime

 Cyber Crime 

 Cyber crime is also called as a computer crime, the use of computer related to day today life is changing for hackers they use computer for fraud, child pornography, and trafficking etc. Nowadays the Cyber Crime increase in daily life because the cyber crime is directly related and dependent on Technology, the more technology is increasing the more cases of cyber crime is increases. We see the pandemic which resulted in a lockdown in country the new form of work is originated it is there in our society but it is more used by nowadays people s a work from home. The pandemic resulted more uses of technology is related work. In my surrounding every person has their personal phone even children to, and this resulted in increases in cyber crime. I will share my own experience that my brother is faced the cyber crime from her bank account more than ten thousand rupees were stole by the cyber criminals, we do the report in police station but nothing happened. 

The first recorded cyber crime took place in the year 1820, even that time there a little technology but the crime happened then the government or an authorities feel to make laws for the newly invented law and from that time the cyber crime is now grown up very much in India we have Information Technology Act 2000 which mention some act and section provide the remedies and prohibition to such Activities. 

Section 65 of Information Technology Act define that Tampering with computer source document, it mentioned that a person who intentionally conceals destroy or alter any computer device source it punished by the three year imprisonment and fine of two lack INR. 

Section 66 of Information Technology Act mentioned that using password of another person, if a person fraudulently uses the password digital signature or other unique identification or documents like Aadhar Card etc, of another person he/she will be punished up to three year of imprisonment and fine of one lack INR. 

Section 67 publishing child porn or predating children online, it mentioned that if a person capture, publishes or transmits images of a child in sexually explicit act or induce anyone under the age of 18 into a sexual act like making porn of child under the age of 18 and post on different websites is a serious crime, and it will be resulted into the person can face imprisonment of seven year and fine up to lacks INR.      

Section 69 talks about the government power to block websites, in this section mentioned that if the government feels it necessary in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, it can interrupt monitor or decrypt any information generated transmitted received or stored in any computer resources. The power is subjected to compliance of procedure. Under section 69A the central government can also block any information from public access. 

Section 43 A of Information Technology Act mentioned that the Data protection at corporate level, if a body corporate is negligent in implementing reasonable security practice which cause wrongful loss or gain to any person such body corporate shall be liable to pay damages to the affection person.   
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996)

     POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996) INTRODUCTION The medical profession is perhaps the noblest profession among any remaining professions in India. For a patient, the specialist resembles God. What's more, God is trustworthy. In any case, that is the patient's opinion. As a general rule, doctors are individuals. Furthermore, to fail is human. Doctors might submit a slip-up. Doctors might be careless. The care staff might be imprudent. Two demonstrations of carelessness might bring about a lot more pressing issue. It very well might be because of gross carelessness. The sky is the limit. In such a situation, it is basic to figure out who was careless, and under what conditions. For this situation, the Supreme Court separated carelessness, impulsiveness, and foolishness. An individual is supposed to be a careless individual when he/she unintentionally submits a demonstration of exclusion and disregards a positive obligation that he/she ought to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...
1 comment
Read more

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more