Skip to main content

EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW

 EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW


Equity itself is derived from a Latin word which means Justice and egalitarianism. It is a system of

law which emanated in the English chancery and encompasses a formal body of indispensable and

procedural rules and doctrine, override common and statutory law. The law relating to equity is

largely based on precedent. Since, it is not viable on the part of the state to contrivance a

comprehensive code of law in order to supervise every eventuality.

Wherein, Law and Equity goes side by side. Equity is consequential in the legal world because men

and laws are fallible. A Court of Equity, Chancery Equity that is legally approved to apply the

principle of Equity, as opposed to the law, to cases brought before it. The principles and rules

emerging from the exercise of residuary powers, which forms the living source of the law of

the state. The system includes some portion of natural justice which is judiciary enforceable.


Equity under Indian Legal System

As a branch of the legal system Equity refers to the essence or rules arising from the

administration process of justice specifically in those cases where the areas are not

adequately covered by statute.

Equity besides supplements the law with quintessence of liberty and goodwill. In India, as a

matter of administration, there was never a well-developed Supreme court as most part of the

law for the application of the court is certified. There the court acts according to the principle

of equity, justice.

The Mohammedan law also partly lays down its origin from the principle of equity. Equity

and adequate ethics have also been expressly laid down with laws. The English laws also

contributed to the development of Equity in the jurisdiction of India. In India, the common

law doctrine of equity had been followed even after the independence.


The principle of law has been stated in various laws such as:

• The Specific Relief Act, 1877 

• ➢ The Indian Trusts Act, 1882

• ➢ The Indian Succession Act,1925 

• ➢ The Transfer of Property Act,1882 


Equity will not be a wrong to be with or without a remedy: 

➢ This maxim states that it is developed as common law which basically doesn’t lay down

any new remedies but it has only nominal damages.


Equality is equity: 

➢ This maxim means that when two or more parties have their common interest but due to

some specific reason their interest has not been qualified, then the equity as a source may

divide their interest equally.


Equitable Remedies

Injunctions: It is a type of remedy in which the court provides the certain law and order

which the parties are pressured to do or abstain from doing a certain specific task.

Specific performance: In this type of remedy, the court passes a statement to the parties in

order to fulfil certain tasks which are interlinked or already a part of a contract.

Recession:  This remedy alternatively takes back the parties to their normal position as they

were in before entering the contract.

Rectification: In this type of remedy court orders to rectify or make certain changes in the

written document so that to reflect what is actually said on the first page.  


CONCLUSION

Equity plays a crucial role in the justice delivery system. In the world of digitalization, almost

every organism is now familiar with the technological part, wherein the computers are the

best replacement for humans nowadays mainly from the position of judge, ‘feed the fact and

laws into it and getting a judgement with all accuracy’.

The importance of equity was greater emphasis than the common law system. During the

centuries it gained importance and became an integral part of an Indian legal system too.

There are certain acts which work through the principle of equity nowadays in India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996)

     POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996) INTRODUCTION The medical profession is perhaps the noblest profession among any remaining professions in India. For a patient, the specialist resembles God. What's more, God is trustworthy. In any case, that is the patient's opinion. As a general rule, doctors are individuals. Furthermore, to fail is human. Doctors might submit a slip-up. Doctors might be careless. The care staff might be imprudent. Two demonstrations of carelessness might bring about a lot more pressing issue. It very well might be because of gross carelessness. The sky is the limit. In such a situation, it is basic to figure out who was careless, and under what conditions. For this situation, the Supreme Court separated carelessness, impulsiveness, and foolishness. An individual is supposed to be a careless individual when he/she unintentionally submits a demonstration of exclusion and disregards a positive obligation that he/she ought to ...

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...