Skip to main content

Mergers & Acquisitions

 Mergers And Acquisitions- An Overview

Meaning Of M & A:

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals in which two or more companies merge in some way. Although the terms mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are sometimes used interchangeably, they have distinct legal meanings. Two companies of similar size merge to establish a new single entity.

An acquisition, on the other hand, occurs when a larger organization purchases a smaller company and absorbs its operations. Depending on the target company's board of directors' approval, M&A agreements can be friendly or hostile.


Types Of M & A Transactions:

Horizontal, vertical, concentric, and conglomerate mergers and acquisitions are examples of distinct types of mergers and acquisitions.

  1. Horizontal Merger
    When a company merges or acquires another company that delivers the same service or product to ultimate customers, this is known as a horizontal merger. Both businesses are in the same industry, serve the same clients, and are in the same stage of development.
     

  2. Vertical Merger:
    A vertical merger is similar to a horizontal merger, except that the companies are at different phases of production. A vertical merger would occur, for example, if a car manufacturer purchased a company that supplied seat belts for the cars. Both businesses are in the same industry, but they are at different stages of the manufacturing process.
     

  3. Concentric Merger:
    A concentric merger is another sort of M&A. This occurs when two businesses in the same industry have the same clients but offer distinct products and services. The products or services must complement one other for a merger to be termed concentric. A cell phone firm merging with a cell phone case company is an example of a concentric merger.
     

  4. Conglomerate Merger:
    A conglomerate merger occurs when two completely different businesses unite. This form of merger and acquisition is commonly used to grow into new industries.



M & A Example

Google and Android Acquisition - Google purchased Android for an estimated $50 million in 2005. Android was a relatively unknown mobile startup company at the time of the transaction. Google was now able to compete in a market dominated by Microsoft's Windows Mobile and Apple's iPhone.

As of May 2018, 54.5 percent of U.S. smartphone subscribers used a Google Android device, indicating that the acquisition was a success.


Reasons Behind M & A Activity

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can occur for a variety of reasons, including:

  1. Identifying and exploiting synergies:
    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are commonly used to produce synergies that make the merged firm worth more than the two enterprises separately. Synergies might emerge as a result of cost-cutting or increased revenue. Cost synergies are achieved through economies of scale, whereas revenue synergies are achieved through cross-selling, expanding market share, or boosting prices. Cost synergies are the easier to quantify and calculate of the two.
     

  2. Increased growth:
    When opposed to organic growth, inorganic growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is usually a speedier technique for a firm to obtain bigger sales. Rather than risk creating those talents internally, a company can gain from acquiring or merging with a company that has cutting-edge capabilities.
     

  3. Increased market dominance:
    A horizontal merger will give a new organization a larger market share and the ability to influence prices. Vertical mergers also provide a company with more market power since it has more control over its supply chain and can avoid supply disruptions from other sources.
     

  4. The ability to diversify:
    Companies in cyclical industries feel compelled to diversify their cash flows to avoid severe losses during a downturn. By acquiring a target in a non-cyclical industry, a company can diversify and reduce market risk.
     

  5. Tax advantages:
    When one company has a lot of taxable income and another has a lot of tax loss carryforwards, the tax benefits are investigated. The acquirer can use the tax losses to reduce its tax liability by acquiring the company with the tax losses. Mergers, on the other hand, are rarely carried out only to save money on taxes.



Advantages Of M & A

Some of the advantages of M&A agreements are related to efficiencies, while others are related to capabilities, such as:

  1. Economies of scale have improved. Costs can be decreased, for example, by being able to purchase raw materials in larger quantities.

  2. Market share has increased. If the two businesses are in the same industry, pooling their resources could result in a higher market share.

  3. Distribution capacities have been improved. Companies may be able to expand their geographic service area or add to their distribution network by growing geographically.

  4. Labor costs are lower. Getting rid of redundant employees can help you save money.

  5. Talented workforce. Expanding the labor pool from which the new, larger company can draw can help the new, larger company grow and thrive.

  6. Financial resources have been increased. Two companies' financial resources are typically bigger than one company's alone, allowing for further investments.



Disadvantages Of M & A

Although mergers and acquisitions are costly endeavors, they can yield significant benefits.

There are also drawbacks, or reasons not to buy an acquisition, such as:

  1. Buying a firm comes with a lot of costs, especially if the company doesn't want to be bought

  2. Higher legal fees might be prohibitively expensive if a company refuses to be acquired.

  3. The expense of foregoing other agreements to concentrate on bringing two companies together.

  4. The probability of a negative reaction to a merger or acquisition, resulting in a drop in the stock price of the company.


Conclusion
Transactions involving mergers and acquisitions are becoming more common. M&A opens up doors that might otherwise be closed to you.

M&A is a common expansion strategy used by businesses to quickly expand their size, service area, talent pool, client base, and resources. However, because the procedure is pricey, firms must be certain that the benefit achieved is significant.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996)

     POONAM VERMA VS. ASHWIN PATEL & ORS (10 MAY, 1996) INTRODUCTION The medical profession is perhaps the noblest profession among any remaining professions in India. For a patient, the specialist resembles God. What's more, God is trustworthy. In any case, that is the patient's opinion. As a general rule, doctors are individuals. Furthermore, to fail is human. Doctors might submit a slip-up. Doctors might be careless. The care staff might be imprudent. Two demonstrations of carelessness might bring about a lot more pressing issue. It very well might be because of gross carelessness. The sky is the limit. In such a situation, it is basic to figure out who was careless, and under what conditions. For this situation, the Supreme Court separated carelessness, impulsiveness, and foolishness. An individual is supposed to be a careless individual when he/she unintentionally submits a demonstration of exclusion and disregards a positive obligation that he/she ought to ...

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...